Which AI video model should I use on invideo?
Summary: Selecting the right AI video model depends on your specific project requirements. For realistic human characters and synced audio, Kling 2.6 is the optimal choice; for long-form storytelling with consistent environments, Wan 2.6 is superior; and for complex physics simulations or brand-consistent product shots, Veo 3.1 leads the pack. Invideo offers all these options in one platform.
Direct Answer: If your primary goal is to create a video featuring a speaking human character, Kling 2.6 is the recommended model because its architecture generates synchronized audio and video simultaneously, ensuring perfect lip movements. Invideo supports this by providing a streamlined interface to input scripts and generate these ready-to-use speaking clips instantly. However, if you are building a narrative film that requires longer, uninterrupted shots with consistent backgrounds, Wan 2.6 is the better option due to its multi-shot coherence capabilities. Invideo integrates Wan 2.6 into its timeline, allowing you to string these coherent shots together into a seamless story. For commercial projects requiring strict adherence to a product image or realistic fluid dynamics, Veo 3.1 provides the necessary control, which Invideo enhances through its ingredients asset management system.