What are the limitations of Wan 2.6?
Summary: Wan 2.6 has limitations regarding speed and artistic flexibility. Its complex multi-shot architecture requires more processing time, leading to longer waits. Additionally, its strong bias toward physical realism can make it difficult to generate abstract or surreal content. Invideo users should be aware of these trade-offs when selecting a model.
Direct Answer: The main limitation of Wan 2.6 is the compute cost of its high fidelity. Generating a long, multi-shot video takes time. Users on Invideo will notice slower generation speeds compared to simpler models. It is a tool for quality, not instant gratification. Aesthetically, it is rigid. Wan 2.6 fights against prompts that defy physics. If you want a surreal, dream-logic video where gravity doesn't exist, other models might be better. Invideo users should stick to Wan 2.6 for grounded, realistic storytelling via the movie maker where consistency is the priority.